Shared maternity "Oekonomi.no
Equal Pay committee on 21 February until his NOU in which they suggested to share maternity leave for three. A portion reserved beta blockers for the mother, a portion reserved for the father and a part that they could share among themselves as they wish. Tom Colbjørnsen who sat on the committee took out dissent, and in a commentary in DN 21 February, he argued that there was talk of an excessive intervention in the family's choice. Later in the evening repeated the Conservative Party leader Erna Solberg much of the same reasoning to Editors 1 on NRK.
Without going into the discussion about the Equal Pay Commission's recommendations are good or bad, I will say that I do not agree with the foundation of Colbjørnsens and Solberg argument. In order for it to hold as money must be birth parents' money. So that we could look at it that way so we need to consider maternity leave as a kind of insurance. So it is fortunately not for most of us.
Parental leave is an incentive scheme, the government gives us money that we are all going to have children, that we should be home with the child when it is small and probably to increase the likelihood that the child be breastfed long. If a child can not or choose beta blockers not to stay home with the baby so will not get the money. We can not say that this limits the family's freedom.
The same applies in relation to whether the government wants to provide incentives through maternity leave in order to promote gender equality. The families still have the opportunity beta blockers to choose not to do as the government wants. Then they will certainly not get money, but they've really nothing and complain when they do not have rendered the government the service that the government wants to pay for. It is not usual to get money for nothing, but the choice and freedom beta blockers is there.
It may of course be that the weakening of the original incentives behind the maternity leave is so strong that a lose as much compared to the one achieved, it is not worth it. This is where the discussion beta blockers should be and if they do not dare to take the discussion so its just as well stay away, this has little to families' choice to make.
Comment by Professor Steinar Strøm:
RSS Feeds RSS Feeds
Last post Clean Frenzy in court High house prices, but no bubble Remove 1000 patch M1 medicalization House prices in 2011 Underlying reasons for the financial crisis Risk Fund Ullsokkmoms interest rate policy in Norwegian
Categories Economic Commentary Labour Economics English beta blockers Housing Facts Finance Commercial and welfare economics Non-current beta blockers comment Incentives International Investment Law Links pages Macroeconomics Microeconomics Environmental Economics Fun Oekonomi.no Public Finance Dictionary Monetary Policy Personal Finance Politics Quotes Tax Statistics Education Development Economics Jokes
Archives April 2012 February 2012 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December beta blockers 2009 November beta blockers 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October beta blockers 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007
34 queries. 0.296 seconds.
Equal Pay committee on 21 February until his NOU in which they suggested to share maternity leave for three. A portion reserved beta blockers for the mother, a portion reserved for the father and a part that they could share among themselves as they wish. Tom Colbjørnsen who sat on the committee took out dissent, and in a commentary in DN 21 February, he argued that there was talk of an excessive intervention in the family's choice. Later in the evening repeated the Conservative Party leader Erna Solberg much of the same reasoning to Editors 1 on NRK.
Without going into the discussion about the Equal Pay Commission's recommendations are good or bad, I will say that I do not agree with the foundation of Colbjørnsens and Solberg argument. In order for it to hold as money must be birth parents' money. So that we could look at it that way so we need to consider maternity leave as a kind of insurance. So it is fortunately not for most of us.
Parental leave is an incentive scheme, the government gives us money that we are all going to have children, that we should be home with the child when it is small and probably to increase the likelihood that the child be breastfed long. If a child can not or choose beta blockers not to stay home with the baby so will not get the money. We can not say that this limits the family's freedom.
The same applies in relation to whether the government wants to provide incentives through maternity leave in order to promote gender equality. The families still have the opportunity beta blockers to choose not to do as the government wants. Then they will certainly not get money, but they've really nothing and complain when they do not have rendered the government the service that the government wants to pay for. It is not usual to get money for nothing, but the choice and freedom beta blockers is there.
It may of course be that the weakening of the original incentives behind the maternity leave is so strong that a lose as much compared to the one achieved, it is not worth it. This is where the discussion beta blockers should be and if they do not dare to take the discussion so its just as well stay away, this has little to families' choice to make.
Comment by Professor Steinar Strøm:
RSS Feeds RSS Feeds
Last post Clean Frenzy in court High house prices, but no bubble Remove 1000 patch M1 medicalization House prices in 2011 Underlying reasons for the financial crisis Risk Fund Ullsokkmoms interest rate policy in Norwegian
Categories Economic Commentary Labour Economics English beta blockers Housing Facts Finance Commercial and welfare economics Non-current beta blockers comment Incentives International Investment Law Links pages Macroeconomics Microeconomics Environmental Economics Fun Oekonomi.no Public Finance Dictionary Monetary Policy Personal Finance Politics Quotes Tax Statistics Education Development Economics Jokes
Archives April 2012 February 2012 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December beta blockers 2009 November beta blockers 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October beta blockers 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007
34 queries. 0.296 seconds.
No comments:
Post a Comment